<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content vs. Promotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryanjoiner.com/2009/10/22/content-vs-promotion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryanjoiner.com/2009/10/22/content-vs-promotion/</link>
	<description>Why then I</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:43:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://bryanjoiner.com/2009/10/22/content-vs-promotion/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanjoiner.com/?p=684#comment-866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for commenting. I saw that sentence, but to jump from there to &quot;promotion is more important than content&quot; (paraphrase) seems like a faulty logic jump. &lt;i&gt;Some&lt;/i&gt; promotion is definitely needed (otherwise, how are people going to find you?) but to say it&#039;s more important than content—it&#039;s just not true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting. I saw that sentence, but to jump from there to &#8220;promotion is more important than content&#8221; (paraphrase) seems like a faulty logic jump. <i>Some</i> promotion is definitely needed (otherwise, how are people going to find you?) but to say it&#8217;s more important than content—it&#8217;s just not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Anthony</title>
		<link>http://bryanjoiner.com/2009/10/22/content-vs-promotion/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bryanjoiner.com/?p=684#comment-865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brian,

I think you&#039;ve missed the prime sentence in the article.

&quot;If you have great content, and no one is reading it will it generate traffic?&quot;

Personally - I do believe in the mantra of content is king. But when you are dwarfed in size by major blogs such as Mashable, - people who&#039;s numbers are massive in the first place you have to get it under the eyeballs of the people that count, and indeed - as many people that you can.

I&#039;ve launched great content before that has went un-noticed. And I have hit the social media jackpot a couple of times. I can see it from both sides of the track.

And as for the comments on hitting the Digg homepage - I&#039;d agree. Digg users do not convert. Delicious on the other hand, and Twitter are two different animals. I&#039;ve seen both of them convert into subscribers that can be used to grow further in the future.

Yes - with social media, sometimes it comes in waves and wanes. But exposure, and continued persistance (resulting in more exposure) - will and does work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian,</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve missed the prime sentence in the article.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you have great content, and no one is reading it will it generate traffic?&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally &#8211; I do believe in the mantra of content is king. But when you are dwarfed in size by major blogs such as Mashable, &#8211; people who&#8217;s numbers are massive in the first place you have to get it under the eyeballs of the people that count, and indeed &#8211; as many people that you can.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve launched great content before that has went un-noticed. And I have hit the social media jackpot a couple of times. I can see it from both sides of the track.</p>
<p>And as for the comments on hitting the Digg homepage &#8211; I&#8217;d agree. Digg users do not convert. Delicious on the other hand, and Twitter are two different animals. I&#8217;ve seen both of them convert into subscribers that can be used to grow further in the future.</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; with social media, sometimes it comes in waves and wanes. But exposure, and continued persistance (resulting in more exposure) &#8211; will and does work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

